Kemal Gözler, Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: Comparative Study (Bursa: Ekin Press, 2008)

 

cited by

 

 

1. John R. Vile, A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments, Santa Barbara, Greenwood Publishing Company, Fifth Edition, 2010, p.112. <http://books.google.com/books?id=u55Cb1sM_dEC&pg=PA112#v=onepage&q&f=false>.

 

2. Mark Tushnet, “The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review”, ANU College of Law Seminars, 20 May 2010. <http://law.anu.edu.au/news/2010_College_Seminars/Tushnet_Paper.pdf>, page 5, footnote 10.

 

3. Venice Commission, Report on constitutional amendment, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 81st Plenary Session (Venice, 11-12 December 2009) on the basis of comments by Ms Gret HALLER (Member, Switzerland), Mr Fredrik SEJERSTED (Substitute member, Norway), Mr Kaarlo TUORI (Member, Finland) and Mr Jan VELAERS (Member, Belgium)  [ CDL-AD(2010)001 ]  < http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-AD(2010)001.aspx  >, page 44, para. 227, footnote 152

 

4. Malah Anna, Constitutional Protection in Cameroon: A Critique of the Amendment Mechanisms, Budapest, Central European University Legal Studies department, LL.M. Thesis, 2009, footnotes 11, 80, 92. <http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2009/malah_anna.pdf>.

 

5. David Kosar, “Judicial Accountability and Democratic Transition: Visegrad Story”, VIII World Congress of Constitutional Law, Mexico City, Workshop 16 - Constitutional Principles and democratic Transition, 6-10 December 2010, <https://www.juridicas.unam.mx/wccl/ponencias/16/288.pdf>, page12, footnote 63.

 

6. Maxim Tomoszek, “Proportionality in Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments”, VIII World Congress of Constitutional Law, Mexico City, Workshop 9 - Proportionality as a principle, 6-10 December 2010, <http://www.juridicas.unam.mx/wccl/ponencias/9/175.pdf>, page 5, footnote 28.

 

7. Jasna Omejec, “The Constitutional Development of European Post-Communýst and Post-Socialist States”, The Constitution: a Basis of Democratic Development of the State, Astana, on August 27-28, 2010, <http://www.constcouncil.kz/eng/vyst/?cid=0&rid=540>, footnote 22.  
(Speech of the President of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia of Jasna Omejec at the international scientific - practical conference: «the Constitution - a basis of democratic development of the state», Astana, on August, 27-28, 2010)

 

8. Constance Grewe, « Le contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois constitutionnelles en Bosnie-Herzégovine », Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, n° 27 (Dossier : Contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois constitutionnelles), Janvier 2010 <http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/francais/documentation-publications/cahiers-du-conseil/cahier-n-27/le-controle-de-constitutionnalite-des-lois-constitutionnelles-en-bosnie-herzegovine.51429.html>  < http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/root/bank/pdf/conseil-constitutionnel-51429.pdf >, footnote 1.

 

9.  Gary Jeffrey Jacobsohn, Constitutional Identity, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2010, page 35, footnote3; page 78, footnote 115. ( http://www.amazon.com/Constitutional-Identity-Gary-Jeffrey-Jacobsohn/dp/0674047664/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1301552954&sr=1-1#reader_0674047664 )

 

10. Richard S. Kay, “Constituent Authority”, American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 59, Number 3, Summer 2011, p.715-761.
( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1703378 ) (footnote 45). http://comparativelaw.metapress.com/content/0536qn68350r5n43/fulltext.pdf

 

11. Kieran Williams, “When a Constitutional Amendment Violates the 'Substantive Core': The Czech Constitutional Court's September 2009 Early Elections Decision”, Review of Central and East European Law, Volume 36, Number 1, 2011 , pp. 33-51. 2011,  p.33-52, foot notes 58, 59, 60, 61. ( http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/10.1163/092598811x12960354394687 )

 

12. Ali Acar, “Tension in the Turkish Constitutional Democracy: Legal Theory, Constitutional  Review And Democracy”, Ankara Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, Winter 2009, p.141-172, footnotes., 4, 5, 84, 91, 95, 96, 98. ( http://www.law.ankara.edu.tr/dergi/ALR/alr-2009-06-02/alr-2009-06-02-acar.pdf )

 

13. Patricia Del Arenal Urueta,  El procedimiento de reforma constitucional a la luz de los principios de la democracia deliberativa:  una alternativa para su control en sede judicial, Tesis, Instituto tecnológico autónomo de México, Mexico, 2010, p.38, 40, 46, 47, 48, 51, 69, 79, 107; footnotes 79, 83, 97, 99, 101, 104, 107, 109, 115, 133, 162, 225, 226. http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Publicaciones/Tesis2011/3PrecedRefConstPrinDemocracia.pdf ).

 

14. Hugo César Araújo de Gusmăo, “El Sistema Constitucional De Irlanda”, Revista De Derecho Constitucional Europeo, Ańo 8, número 15, Enero-Junio de 2011, Págs. 261-284 (p.269, footnote 3, 5),

        ( http://www.ugr.es/~redce/REDCE15pdf/ReDCE15.pdf ) ( http://www.ugr.es/~redce/REDCE15/articulos/06HCAraujo.htm )
 

15. Ozan O. Varol, “The Origins and Limits of Originalism: A Comparative Study”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Volume 44, Number 5, November 2011, p.1239-1297,  (p.1291, footnote 317) ( http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/journal-of-transnational-law/download.aspx?id=7463 )

 

16. Aharon Barak, “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments”,  Israel Law Review, Vol 44, 2011, p.321-341 footnotes 11-18, 42, 47, 56, 58. (http://law.huji.ac.il/upload/44Barak.pdf)

 

17. Mark Tushnet, “Constitution”, in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Edited by Michel Rosenfeld and Andras Jajo), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, p.217-231, p.222, footnote 21, 231. ( http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=uP3VWeTMnxsC&pg= )

 

18. Klaude Klein and András Sajó, “Constitution-Making: Process and Substance”, in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Edited by Michel Rosenfeld and Andras Jajo), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, p.439, footnote 84. ( http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=uP3VWeTMnxsC&pg= )

       

19. Alec Stone Sweet, “Constitutional Courts”, in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Edited by Michel Rosenfeld and Andras Jajo), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, p.822, footnote 27. (Available at: http://works.bepress.com/alec_stone_sweet/43  ( http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=alec_stone_sweet )

 

20. Lech Garlicki and Zofia A. Garlicka, “External Review of Constitutional Amendments? Internatýonal Law as a Norm of Reference”, Israel Law Review, Vol 44, 2011, p.343-367, footnotes 8, 18. ( http://law.huji.ac.il/upload/44Garlicki.pdf )

 

21. Roberto Toniatti and Mattia Magrassi, Magistratura, giurisdizione ed equilibri istituzionali: Dinamiche e confronti europei e comparati, Milano, Univ. Trento. Dip. scienze giuridiche, CEDAM, 2011,  p.586, footnote 36 ( http://books.google.com.tr/books?isbn=8813308027  ; http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=l7vTUvKnw8oC&hl=tr  ).

 

22. Yaniv Roznai and Serkan Yolcu, “An unconstitutional constitutional amendment - The Turkish perspective: A Comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court’s Headscarf Decision”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2012, Vol. 10, No. 1, p.175–207, p.193, footnote 81, p.195, footnote 91, 93; p.196, footnote 94, 95, 96; p.197; p.198, footnote 103, ( http://icon.oxfordjournals.org/content/10/1/175.abstract )
 

23. Juan Gabriel Gómez Albarello, “Reformas inconstitucionales a la constitución: żun caso agravado de la tensión entre la democracia y el constitucionalismo”, Análisis Político, nş 75, Bogotá, Mayo-Agosto, 2012, p.67-88, (p.73, footnotes 5, 8;  p.82, 86)  ( http://www.iepri.org/docs/libros/60apol75.pdf )

 

24. Valentina Bărbăţeanu, “The Influence of the Constitutional Jurisdictions on the Basic Laws”, LESIJ (Lex ET Scientia. Juridical Series), No XIX, Vol. 2/2012, p.137-148 ( http://lexetscientia.univnt.ro/download/460_460_lesij_js_XIX_2_2012_art_009.pdf ), p.145, footnote 38

 

25. Otto Pfersmann, “Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: a normativist approach”, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, March 2012, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp.81-113 ( http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00708-012-0130-x#  ), p.103, footnote 23.

 

26. Drinóczi Tímea, “Gondolatok az Alkotmánybíróság 61/2011. (VII. 12.) AB határozatával kapcsolatban”, JURA: a Pécsi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos lapja, 2012/1. számp, page 37-46 (p.41, 46, notes 36, 38, 40, 41, 45, 46, 51).

     (”Reflections on Constitutional Court Decisions 61/2011, July 12th”, Legal Review of the Law Faculty of the University of Pécs, ( http://jura.ajk.pte.hu/JURA_2012_1.pdf )

 

27. Jiří Novák, Problematika tzv. nezměnitelných a nezrušitelných ustanovení v ústavách, Právnická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Magisterský studijní program právo a právní věda, http://is.muni.cz/th/257112/pravf_m/Diplomova_prace.txtv , notes 51, 170.

 

28. Ясна Омежек, “Новые европейские конституции переходного периода и преобразующая роль конституционных судов”, Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения, № 2, 2012, стр.10-26. (http://www.nbpublish.com/ilmag/mag_contents_2_2012_18249.html ) [Jasna Omejec, “New European Transition Constitutions and the Transformative Role of Constitutional Courts”, Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, No 2, 2012, p.10-26, footnote 15 ( http://www.nbpublish.com/engilm/mag_contents_2_2012_18250.html  ]

 

29. Bojan Čaić, “Turski ustavnosudski conundrum i zabrana političkih stranaka: dileme ustavne reforme 2010 godina”,  Pravnik, Vol.46,  No.92, Prosinac 2012,  p.37-57, p. 50, foot note 79. ( http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/144605  )

 

30. Mark Tushnet, “The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review”, in Comparative Constitutional Law (Edited by Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon) (Research Handbooks in Comparative Law Series),  Ceentelham, Edward Elgar Publishing,  2011, p.332, footnote 9.

    (ttp://books.google.com.tr/books?id=x5AETTkgsyQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=  )

 

31. Aharon Barak, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012   - p.31, footnote 32, 653. (http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=hHRNlILmLjUC&pg=PA31&dq=G%C3%B6zler)

 

32. Jennifer Widner and Xenophon Contiades, “Constitution-writing processes”, in Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law, (Edited by Mark Tushnet, Thomas Fleiner and Cheryl Saunders), Oxon, Routledge, 2013, p.58, 69.

    ( http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=gvdmIXbgZQUC&pg=PA69&dq=%22Gozler%22,+%22Judicial+Review+of+Constitutional+Amendments%22&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=2glhUo3sFoTEtAbyyoCADQ&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Gozler%22&f=false )

 

33. Jan Filip, “K některým legislativním otázkám přijetí Listiny základních práv a svobod (20. výročí)”, Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, Ročník XVIII, číslo 4/2010, p.315-417, p.323, footnote 57, ( http://www.law.muni.cz/dokumenty/11341 )

 

34. Roberto Toniatti, “Le forme e la cultura costituzionale dell'equilibro istituzionale”, in Magistratura, giurisdizione ed equilibri istituzionali: dinamiche e confronti europei e comparati, (Edited by Roberto Toniatti & Mattia Magrassi), Milano, CEDAM, 2011, p.586, footnote 36.

        http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=l7vTUvKnw8oC&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=G%C3%B6zler&f=false

 

35. Jasna Omejec, The Constitutional Development оf European Post-Communist аnd Post-Socialist States”, Kонституциoннoе правосудие, Выпóсę  3(49) 2010, s.33-54, p.38, footnote 22. ( http://www.concourt.am/armenian/con_right/3.49-2010/vestnik49.pdf )

 

36. Jasna Omejec, “Kontrola Ustavnosti Ustavnih Normi (Ustavnih Amandmana I Ustavnih Zakona)”, Godišnjak Akademije pravnih znanosti Hrvatske, Vol.1 No.1 Prosinac 2010, http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/101889 footnote 34, 48, 49 54.

 

37. Zia Mody, 10 Judgements That Changed IndiaPenguin UK, 2013, footnote 53, 59, ( https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=MWEtAAAAQBAJ )

 

38. Yaniv Roznai, “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments—The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea”, American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 61, Issue 3 / Summer 2013, p.657-719.  (p.660, footnote 10) http://www.academia.edu/7726027/Unconstitutional_Constitutional_Amendments_The_Migration_and_Success_of_a_Constitutional_Idea

        (+ p.665, footnote 43, 44, p.690, footnote 196:  : K.Gözler, Le Pouvoir de revision contitutionnelle)

 

39. Sabrina Ragone, “El Control Material de las Reformas Constitucionales en Perspectiva Comparada”, UNED. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, núm. 31, 2013, pp. 385-406, < http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv.php?pid=bibliuned:TeoriayRealidadConstitucional-2013-31-6060&dsID=Documento.pdf  > p.392, footnote 1

 

40. Yaniv Roznai, “Legisprudence Limitations on Constitutional Amendments? Reflections on The Czech Constitutional Court’s Declaration of Unconstitutional Constitutional Act”, ICL Journal (Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law), Vol. 8, 1/2014, pp.29-57 < http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2423267 >, p.33, foot note 12, 21, p.54.

 

41. Lars Vinx and Gulsen Seven “The Democratic Legitimacy of Strong Constitutional Entrenchment: Cases of Turkey and India”, http://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/conference/papers/2014/Seven.Vinx_.Strong%20Constitutional%20Entrenchment.pdf , p.37.

 

42. Manoj Mate, “State Constitutions and the Basic Structure Doctrine”, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Winter 2014, Vol. 45, Issue 2, p.441-498, < http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2429993##  > p.450, footnote 30

 

43. Yaniv Roznai, “The Theory and Practice of ‘Supra-Constitutional’ Limits on Constitutional Amendments”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly (ICLQ), Vol 62, July 2013, p.557–597, footnote 40, 41, 47, 204

          (http://journals.cambridge.org)              https://www.academia.edu/7726003/The_Theory_and_Practice_of_Supra-Constitutional_Limits_on_Constitutional_Amendments

+ footnote 12: K Gözler, Pouvoir constituant (Ekin Press 1999) 10–28;

 + footnote 29: K Gözler, Le pouvoir de révision constitutionnelle (Thčse pour le doctorat en droit, Université Montesquieu – Bordeaux IV, Faculté de droit, des sciences sociales et politiques 1995) 287–350

 + footnote 132: K Gözler, ‘La Question de la Superiorité des Normes de Droit international sur la Constitution’ (1996) 46 Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 200.

 

44. Richard Albert, “The Structure of Constitutional Amendments Rules”, Wake Forest Law Review, Vol 49, 2014, footnote 256.  ( http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1063&context=richardalbert ) ( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2461507 )
 

45. Adem Kassie Abebe, “The substantive validity of constitutional amendments in South Africa”,  South African Law Journal, Vol 131, Number 3, 2014, p.656-694, footnote 14 ( http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication_article/ju_salj_v131_n3_a10 )

 

46. Enver Hasani, “Constitutional Protection of the Head of State: The Case of Kosovo”, Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, Vol 7,  2013, p.128- http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/vioincl7&div=26&id=&page=

 

47. Suzie Navot, “Israel: Creating a Constitution - The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court (1994–2010)”, in The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, (Edited by Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau), Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2013,  p.129-153, footnote 65 ( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2438569  ; https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=tGp6BAAAQBAJ&pg );   (https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=8obbBAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA151&ots=LhRnLS2lyM&dq=%22G%C3%B6zler%22%20%22international%20journal%20of%20constitutional%20law%22&hl=tr&pg=PR5#v=onepage&q=G%C3%B6zler&f=false )

 

48. Maartje de Visser, Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2014, p.443, footnote 206.

        ( https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&id=-Y3qAwAAQBAJ&q= )

 

49. Yaniv Roznai, Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: a study of the nature and limits of constitutional amendment powers. PhD thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), 2014, http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/915/1/Roznai_Unconstitutional-constitutional-amendments.pdf, page 17, 53, 75, 98, 99, 100, 101, 109, 110, 111, 129, 127, 129, 154, 172, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 187, 194, 219, 220, 221, 222, 306

 

50. Joel I. Colón-Ríos, “A New Typology of Judicial Review of Legislation”, Global Constitutionalism, Volume 3,  Issue 02, July 2014, p.143-169, footnote 21 (Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2437157 May 14, 2014). (http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9302591)

 

51. Yaniv Roznai, “Unamendability and the Genetic Code of the Constitution”, New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, http://lsr.nellco.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1516&context=nyu_plltwp Available at SSRN 2569279, 2015 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2569279 ), footnote 12.

 

52. Richard Albert, “Amending Constitutional Amendment Rules”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 13, Issue 3, July 2015  http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2498132  footnote 235.

 

53. Anna Śledzińska-Simon, “Constitutional identity in 3D: A model of individual, relational, and collective self and its application in Poland”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2015, Volume 13, Issue 1, p.124-155.

 

54. Yaniv Roznai and Silvia Suteu, “The Eternal Territory? The Crimean Crisis and Ukraine’s Territorial Integrity as an Unamendable Constitutional Principle”, German Law Journal, 2015, Vol. 16, No. 03, p.542-580, footnote 97, 110, 113. (https://www.germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol16-No3/PDF_Vol_16_No_03.9_Roznai&SuteuFinal.pdf)
 

55. Richard Albert, “The Unamendable Core of the United States Constitution”, Comparative Perspectives on the Fundamental Freedom of Expression, (Edited by Andras Koltay), Budapest, Wolters Kluwer,  2015. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/richardalbert/46 , http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1985&context=lsfp  footnote 131.

 

56. Reijer Passchier and Maarten Stremler, “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in European Union Law: Considering the Existence of Substantive Constraints on Treaty Revision”, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol 5(1) (forthcoming 2016), footnote, 5, 42  http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2561209 , ; http://www.academia.edu/15346118/Unconstitutional_Constitutional_Amendments_in_European_Union_Law_Considering_the_Existence_of_Substantive_Constraints_on_Treaty_Revision

 

57.  Ergun Özbudun, The Constitutional System of Turkey: 1876 to the Present, New york, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, p.170, 176.

 

58. Grzegorz Kryszen, "Sad konstytucyjny Republiki Turcji a zmiany konstytucyjne", in Aktualne problemy reform konstytucyjnych (Edited by Stanisław Bożyk), Bialystok, Temida4, 2013, p.552, 554. (https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=amcsAwAAQBAJ&)

 

59. Yaniv Roznai  "Review by Yaniv Roznai: Is Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments Undemocratic?", I·CONnect: Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law,  http://www.iconnectblog.com/2013/10/article-review-response-carlos-bernal-pulido-and-yaniv-roznai-on-unconstitutional-constitutional-amendments/ footnote 3.

 

60. Yaniv Roznai, "We the Limited People" (Draft for discussion at NYU Global Fellows Forum, March 10, 2015), footnote, 27, 48, 87 (http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Roznai%20-%20March%2010th%20Forum%20draft.pdf)

 

61. S. Mohammed Azaad, "Revisiting the theory of “implied limitations” on the amending power of the parliament in the Indian constitutio", Legal Bloc Journal, Vol. 2 Issue 1 (Oct. 2015), p.21 (http://www.legalbloc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Legal-Bloc-Journal-Vol-2-Issue-1.pdf)

 

62. Andřej Preuss, Změna podstatných náležitostí demokratického právního státu v judikatuře Ústavního soudu ČR, Praha, Univerzita Karlova, Právnická fakulta, 2013, p.14,15, 22, 25, 26, 34, 69, 103 (https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/download/150018653)

 

63. Lawrence Friedman, "The Potentially Unamendable State Constitutional Core", Arkansas Law Review, 2016,  Vol. 69, p.317.

 

64. Zelalem Eshetu  "The Scope and Limitation of the Amending Power in Ethiopia: Thinking beyond Literalism",  Mekelle University Law Journal, Vol. 4 June 2016, p.1-33, footnotes 10, 15, 27, 52, 67, 69, 72, 77, 78, 147 ( http://www.mu.edu.et/mulj/pdfs/V4_N1/V4_N1_1.pdf )

 

65. Mohamed Abdelaal, "Entrenchment Illusion: The Curious Case of Egypt’s Constitutional Entrenchment Clause", Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 16, Issue 2, 5-1-2016, p.1-  footnote 189,  http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/ckjicl/vol16/iss2/1  )

 

66. Elene Janelidze, Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Georgia, France and Germany–The Quest for Eternity, LLM Thesis, Central European University, 2016, footnotes 35, 74, 75 ( http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2016/janelidze_elene.pdf )

 

67. Christine Bell et al., "Constitution-Making and Political Settlements in Times of Transition", Global Constitutionalism, special section, 2017 Forthcoming; Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2016/23. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2850530, footnotes 3, 48

 

68. Bartosz Marciniak, "Constituent Power and Legitimate Constitutional Authority",  (June 4, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2818277 footnotes 194, 197

 

69. Gábor Halmai, "Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments and New Constitutions in Comparative Perspective", Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 38, 2016, foothotes, p.129, 135 (Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2796521 ).

 

70. Richard Albert, "The Theory and Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment in Canada" Queen's Law Journal, Vol. 41  (2016 Forthcoming), footnotes 73,  244, (Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2649447 )

 

71. Yaniv Roznai, "Towards a Theory of Unamendability" (February 24, 2015). NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 15-12, footnotes 208, 324, 335, 339, 345, 430, 435, 436 (Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2569292).  

 

72. Geertjes, Gert Jan and Jerfi Uzman, "Conventions of Unamendability: Covert Constitutional Unamendability in (Two) Politically Enforced Constitutions" (September 16, 2015). Footnotes 8, 44, 62, (Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2619643 ).

 

73. Mequanint Dubie, Amendment of State Constitutions in Ethiopia in Comparison With Other Federations, Institute of Federalism and Legal Studies Department of Comparative Public Law and Good Governance, 2015, footnotes 31, 43 81,

 

74. Bartosz Marciniak, "Constituent Power: Reality, Integrity and Unamendability" (November 2, 2015), Footnotes 102, 105, (Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2736766

 

75. Ana Horvat Vuković, "“U Ime Ustava” – Materijalne Granice Promjene Ustava (In the Name of the Constitution – Substantive Limits of Constitutional Change)", Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, Vol.65 No.3-4 Kolovoz 2015,  p.481-503, Footnotes 41, 77.  (http://hrcak.srce.hr/149397)

 

 


For Citations in HeinOnline Database, Click Here [Short] [Full]


 

 

 

 


Editor: Kemal Gözler

 

E-mail: kgozler[at]hotmail.com

Home: www.anayasa.gen.tr

Creation Date:  May 27, 2010

Last Updated: October 21, 2016